Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 196
KING v. LUCUS et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Defendant: MELANIE DAVIS, DEAN CULLER, HODGIN CARRIE and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MUSGROVE v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Defendant: TERRY INGRAM, LACHELLE BULLARD, GARY HUNT and others
Plaintiff: SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00615
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00612
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TERRY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00530
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: GARY IVAN TERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
CLOSNER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00411
Petitioner: TERRY JAMES CLOSNER
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner: DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLAKELY v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff: Larry Gray Blakley, Sr.
Defendant: WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, SERGEANT Joshua Mabe, Deputy Cody Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?