Cases 1 - 10 of 270
HENDERSON v. SHANLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LAMOND HENDERSON
Defendant:
ASHLIE SHANLEY, NATHANIEL KNUST, VAN WORTH SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BAKER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
JULIUS WAYNE BAKER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PORTER v. KELLY
as 1:2023cv01094
Petitioner:
WAYNE PORTER
Respondent:
LB KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MURPHY v. PAGE et al
as 1:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Defendant:
SAM PAGE, OFFICER LUCAS, OFFICER KENNETH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRD v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN WAYNE BYRD
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BYRD v. GUILFORD COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN WAYNE BYRD
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER- GREENSBORO and GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GIBSON et al v. STROUD et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEON GIBSON and MICHELLE P. GIBSON
Defendant:
CHIEF TRAVIS STROUD, OFFICER DEVON WILLIAMSON, LIEUTENANT BRENT J. MACFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
DURHAM v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
JONES v. USA
as 1:2023cv00791
Petitioner:
BRUCE WAYNE JONES, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MURPHY v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, SAM PAGE, OFFICER LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
