Cases 1 - 10 of 13
WILLIAMS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DRAKE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PORTIER, LLC, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
DRAKE'S FRESH PASTA COMPANY v. ZHIDEL, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Drake's Fresh Pasta Company
Defendant:
Zhidel, Inc. and Magnum Transport Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
ROCHESTER v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv00792
Plaintiff:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Defendant:
BETH DRAKE, BRYAN STIRLING, U.S.D. CT. SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP
as 1:2019cv00410
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEE SANDERS
Defendant:
SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00995
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WARNER v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00727
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
CURTIS WARNER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00726
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DRAKE v. USA
as 1:2018cv00320
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LEON DRAKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOLLOMON v. SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP
as 1:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
TYROME M. HOLLOMON, JR.
Defendant:
SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
DRAKE v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00694
Plaintiff:
JERRY DRAKE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
