Cases 41 - 50 of 448
Hixson v. Oblon
as 3:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Richard Hixson
Defendant:
David A. Oblon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Henderson County Hospital Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Melvin Richard Robinson, III
Defendant:
Henderson County Hospital Corporation doing business as Pardee and Southeastern Sports Medicine Services, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Melvin Richard Robinson, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hall et al v. Charlotte Arena Operations, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Joanne Hall and Alfred Hall
Defendant:
Charlotte Arena Operations, LLC, Hornets Sports & Entertainment, Spectrum Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hilliard v. USA
as 1:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
William Richard Hilliard, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bishop v. Funderburk et al
as 3:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Dan Bishop
Defendant:
Amy L Funderburk, Paul Newby, Robin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Scates et al
as 5:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Reynolds
Defendant:
Donna Scates doing business as Scates & Sellers and Richard Jonas
Hefner v. State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2021cv00317
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Hefner and Ricky L. Hefner
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and North Carolina Dept. P.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
