Cases 81 - 90 of 177
Clark v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
Belinda Kay Clark
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. CitiFinancial Servicing LLC
as 3:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Edna W. Clark and Benjamin F. Clark
Defendant:
CitiFinancial Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
United States of America v. Approximately $60,424.52 et al
as 3:2015cv00450
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $60,424.52, Approximately $6,986.68, Approximately $282,416.11 and others
Claimant:
Berkeley-Hughes & Associates, LLC and Cedric D Clark
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
Clark v. Cellco Partnership
as 3:2015cv00338
Plaintiff:
Judith Clark
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership
Cause Of Action: Telemarketing & Consumer Fraud
Nunn v. Perry et al
as 1:2015de00100
Plaintiff:
Myron Roderick Nunn
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, Ladonna Browning, FNU Summers and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark et al v. RCI Entertainment (North Carolina), Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00141
Plaintiff:
Asia Omega Clark , Ebony N. Beyah , Charlene Beatty-Bell and others
Defendant:
RCI Entertainment (North Carolina), Inc., Top Shelf Entertainment, LLC and RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helen M. Clark v. Senior Care Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00317
Defendant:
Senior Care Group, Inc. , Red River Rehabilitation, LLC and Senior Care Group of McDowell, LLC
Plaintiff:
Helen M. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
