Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. USA
as 5:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Troy Daniel Hamilton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Norris et al v. City of Asheville et al
as 1:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sarah Boddy Norris, Abigail Temoshchuk-Reynolds, Amy Hamilton and others
Defendant:
City of Asheville, Debra Campbell, D. Tyrell McGirt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strickland v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
Cain Hamilton Strickland
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hamilton v. Kenworthy
as 1:2020cv00356
Petitioner:
Brodie Hamilton
Respondent:
George Kenworthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grady v. Rogers et al
as 3:2020cv00601
Defendant:
FNU Rogers, FNU Dennis, FNU Hodgeson and others
Plaintiff:
Tracey Terrell Grady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Hamilton
as 1:2020cv00296
Defendant:
Thomas A. Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Kayie Shaune D. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
