Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Anderson v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Anderson
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, The Office of the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Emke v. City of Lenoir, North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Chad James Emke
Defendant:
City of Lenoir, North Carolina, Lenoir Police Department and Brent August Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phelps v. CPI Security Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00682
Plaintiff:
Kelley Phelps
Defendant:
CPI Security Systems, Inc. and Kenneth Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00655
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Moore, Jr. et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00157
Defendant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc, 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and others
Plaintiff:
Moore, Jr, Howard Milton Moore, Jr. and Lena Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Baynes et al
as 3:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
A. Cotten Wright
Defendant:
John A. Baynes, III, John Baynes Company, Inc., JBC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Hamilton v. USA
as 5:2015cv00140
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas Phelps Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Phelps v. Perry et al
as 1:2014cv00133
Plaintiff:
John C. Phelps
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, Nicole E. Sullivan, Jackie Parker and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00191
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
