Cases 61 - 70 of 16,177
Caruso v. USA
as 8:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Timothy E. Caruso
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Greater Omaha Packing Co., Inc. v. Johnson Feed, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Greater Omaha Packing Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Johnson Feed, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nash et al v. Nebraska Department of Economic Development
as 8:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Nash and North O Rising, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Economic Development
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stump v. Nebraska, buffalo county court
as 8:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Logan Everett Stump
Defendant:
Nebraska, buffalo county court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sisk v. Scripps Media, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lee Sisk
Defendant:
Scripps Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Parker v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 8:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Josh Parker
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Jareske v. Bennington Public School District et al
as 8:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Molly Jareske
Defendant:
Bennington Public School District, Satarah Reardon, Garet Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Alvarado-Guerrero v. USA
as 8:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Gustavo Alvarado-Guerrero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coffman v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Brandie Coffman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
