Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Diomande v. Solomon et al
as 9:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Khaleed Diomande
Defendant:
Gabriel Solomon, Caleb Gomes and Ms. Brook Blaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradshaw v. Marshall et al
as 9:2021cv00826
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
Matthew Welch, Gabriel Orbegozo, Nathan Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abbott et al vs. Beech-Nut Company
as 1:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Abbott, Erin Abdoo, Krystal Leigh Anderson and others
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gabriel v. Capra
as 9:2021cv00500
Petitioner:
Duane Gabriel
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore et al v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
as 1:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
Robyn Moore and Gabrielle Stuve
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Thomas et al v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
as 1:2021cv00133
Plaintiff:
Emily Bigaouette, Jen MacLeod, Laura Eggnatz and others
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Dominick Grossi, Michael Motherway, Emily Baccari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bump v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01077
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Bump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Henderson v. United States Government
as 9:2020cv00941
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Henderson
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gilmore v. Karandy et al
as 9:2020cv00542
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gilmore
Defendant:
Nesmith Fisher and David Karandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
