Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Santos v. The Syracuse Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Dos Santos, III
Defendant:
The Syracuse Police Department, Det. Mathew Fraher, Det. Kate Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolbert v. Syracuse Police Dept et al.
as 5:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Latisha Nicole Tolbert
Defendant:
Sgt Cazzolli, Terell Irvine, Picotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beckwith v. The City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2021cv00809
Plaintiff:
Davonne Beckwith
Defendant:
The City of Syracuse, Detective Terell Irvine and Patrol Officer Jacob Breen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv01011
Plaintiff:
Galo Irvin Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
The Fiqh Mosque, Inc. v. Dimitriadis et al
as 1:2020cv00940
Defendant:
Don Hogan, Matthew Maloney, Irvin Ackerman and others
Plaintiff:
The Fiqh Mosque, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Irvin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00709
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Wayne Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baker v. United States et al
as 9:2018cv00178
Defendant:
United States, Madison County D SS, Chittenango Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Irvin Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvine v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2015cv00584
Plaintiff:
Jason Irvine
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, Alexander J. Cazzolli, Brian Fougnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvine v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2014cv01565
Plaintiff:
Jason Irvine
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, Alexander J. Cazzolli, Brian Fougnier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
