Cases 41 - 50 of 197
Bonnell v. McBee
as 1:2021cv01604
Petitioner:
Melvin Bonnell
Respondent:
Chris McBee and Warden Chris McBee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cook et al v. Yost et al
as 3:2021cv01544
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cook and Limitless Existence, LLC
Defendant:
Dave Yost, Annette Smith-Chambers, Tom McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Chambers, et al
as 1:2021cv01541
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bishop
Defendant:
Annette Chambers, Earlena Miller, Chris Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trammell v. Ontario Local School District Board of Education, et al
as 1:2021cv00904
Defendant:
Lisa Carmichael, Chris Miller and Ontario Local School District Board of Education
Plaintiff:
Terance Trammell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williamson v. Fatheree et al
as 5:2021cv00565
Defendant:
Det. Jerome Patrick McMillan, City of Akron, Det. Jason Kline and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Williamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. The MetroHealth System et al
as 1:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Chris Mealey, John Does #1-5, MetroHealth System and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Butler, et al
as 1:2021cv00382
Defendant:
Patterson, Conley, Portis and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy et al v. Campo et al
as 1:2020cv02489
Defendant:
Sheffield Lake Police Department, Lorain County Sheriff's Department, Elyria Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Thompson, Maiya McCoy, Jennifer Ginley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloodworth v. Pouperd et al
as 3:2020cv02424
Defendant:
IIS Jenkins, Corrections Officer Ford, Corrections Officer Mark Pouperd and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bloodworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gile v. Drake et al
as 1:2020cv01615
Defendant:
Daniel Moore, Brian K. Roberts, David Bonita and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Gile
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
