Cases 91 - 100 of 777
RODRIGUEZ-COLON v. MARLER et al
as 2:2020cv04083
Plaintiff:
FERNANDINO RODRIGUEZ-COLON
Defendant:
SEAN MARLER, N. MANSI, J. O'BOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
as 2:2020cv04104
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Plaintiff:
Wanny Rodriguez
RODRIGUEZ v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv03307
Plaintiff:
ROSA MARIA RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv03570
Plaintiff:
ANDREW RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CINTRON-VAZQUEZ v. VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2020cv03433
Defendant:
RAMIRO VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, RAMON VAZQUEZ and RAMON G VASQUEZ
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CINTRON-VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CINTRON-VAZQUEZ v. VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ et al
as 5:2020cv03433
Defendant:
RAMIRO VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, RAMON VAZQUEZ and RAMON G VASQUEZ doing business as ALBERT BROWN CARRIER
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CINTRON-VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv03168
Plaintiff:
NELSON RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RODRIGUEZ v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2020cv02852
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
EDDIE RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ESTATE OF ANDREW DAVIS GOOD et al v. RODRIGUEZ-SANTANA et al
as 5:2020cv01431
Defendant:
JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10, BOROUGH OF AKRON, LANCASTER COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ANDREW DAVIS GOOD and KRISTIN GOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
