Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01689
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BRANDT et al v. GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00597
Plaintiff: ROBERT BRANDT and ANNETTE BRANDT
Defendant: GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BRANDT v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff: FLOYD BRANDT
Defendant: MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
AH et al v. GARNET VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2022cv01785
Plaintiff: AH, CH and JH
Defendant: GARNET VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT, VINCENT CITARELLI and STEPHEN BRANDT
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04741
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
BEHANNA v. TESLA et al
as 2:2021cv02613
Defendant: HEATHER TESLA, PAUL BRANDT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY and others
Plaintiff: DEBORAH BEHANNA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02598
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv02731
Defendant: MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, T.A. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff: SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01845
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv02231
Defendant: SUPT. FERGUSON, SUPT. GILMORE, DEPUTY DIALASANDRO and others
Plaintiff: SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?