Cases 1 - 10 of 34
JONES v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv03791
Plaintiff:
AKHENATON JONES
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GREGORY VRATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. GOGGIN et al
as 2:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant:
THOMAS NELLING, JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2021cv04821
Plaintiff:
JAWON HURLEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
KYLE RUSSELL, JANINE DONATE, THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURLEY v. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2021cv03093
Plaintiff:
REGINALD HURLEY
Defendant:
ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith, VMD, PhD et al v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2020cv04098
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Pruco Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Karyl J Hurley, DVM and Gail K Smith, VMD, PhD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RLI INSURANCE COMPANY v. EETM, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03874
Plaintiff:
RLI INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JAMES D'AMBROSIA, EETM, LLC and HURLEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ROGERS v. USP LEWISBURG et al
as 2:2019cv03537
Defendant:
C. MOORE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. EARP, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. HURLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY N. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURLEY et al v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05320
Plaintiff:
RENEE DOUGHERTY, MICHAEL WOOD, RANDY CURRIE and others
Defendant:
BAVARIAN MOTOR WORKS and BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
HURLEY v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2018cv02175
Plaintiff:
RASHEEDA HURLEY
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
