Cases 1 - 10 of 89
MOODY v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MOODY
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A.A. et al v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2022cv01621
Plaintiff:
A.A. and DANIELLE ROWE
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, DETECTIVE AUSTIN KRAUSE, EAST HEMPFIELD TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
needle v. T Rowe Price Group Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04786
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NEEDLE, MICHAEL NEEDLE, WILLIAM A. NEEDLE and others
Defendant:
T Rowe Price Group Inc., T Rowe Price Associates Inc., Edward Dosik and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MARKS v. JONES et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Defendant:
ALVIN ROWE, ROY JONES, THE MARTIN BROWER CO., LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS MARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROWE v. KENNETT TOWNSHIP
as 2:2020cv04953
Defendant:
KENNETT TOWNSHIP
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COOPER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv04150
Defendant:
WARDEN, JOHN WETZEL, MRS. PRICE and others
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNION INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2018cv01239
Plaintiff:
THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, EVEREST INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
JENKINS v. ALLEN et al
as 5:2018cv00233
Plaintiff:
WENDELL BRADFORD JENKINS
Defendant:
DAVID W. ALLEN, STEPHEN G. KLONEL, REBECCA NICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SAUCON VALLEY MANOR, INC. et al v. DALLAS et al
as 5:2017cv02568
Plaintiff:
SAUCON VALLEY MANOR, INC. and NIMITA KAPOOR-ATIYEH
Defendant:
THEODORE DALLAS , JACQUELINE ROWE , MATT JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
