Cases 11 - 20 of 65
HENDERSON v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD
as 3:2022cv00043
Petitioner:
ANDRE L. HENDERSON
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GILBERT v. BONACCORSI et al
as 2:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GILBERT
Defendant:
NICHOLAS BONACCORSI, IAN HENDERSON, ANTHONY CANCILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENDERSON v. KONINKELIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
LINDA HENDERSON
Defendant:
KONINKELIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bain et al v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01488
Plaintiff:
Don Bain, Judy Gutierrez, Rona Kaneff and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MASSAQUOI v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS, MAUREEN MALANOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES et al v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2021cv01094
Plaintiff:
CARL S. JONES, JR., ANTHONY LEE, CHARLES LANTZY and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER
Petitioner:
CODY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HENDERSON v. MONONGAHELA VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC.
as 2:2021cv01087
Plaintiff:
GARNETT HENDERSON
Defendant:
MONONGAHELA VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HENDERSON v. AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv00849
Plaintiff:
DARESSE M. HENDERSON
Defendant:
AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HENDERSON v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2021cv00575
Plaintiff:
SAMONIA HENDERSON
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STRINGER v. HENDERSON et al
as 2:2021cv00547
Defendant:
C/O DAY, ROBERT GILMORE, MR. GUMBAREVIC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STRINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
