Cases 11 - 20 of 56
GAY v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv01311
Defendant:
POWERMASTER PACIFIC PRODUCTS, ZURN INDUSTRIES, FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
CARL E. GAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WINKLES v. HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC.
as 2:2019cv00825
Defendant:
HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WINKLES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ROSS v. ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00543
Defendant:
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC., POWERBUILT, INC., ADVANCE STORES COMPANY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EARL E. KNOX COMPANY v. LIBERTY TOOL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv00290
Defendant:
LIBERTY TOOL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, UKRAGAZPROMBUT and UKRTRANSGAZ
Plaintiff:
EARL E. KNOX COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MISCELLANEOUS GROW EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS
as 2:2018cv00829
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MISCELLANEOUS GROW EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
WILLIS v. DURKIN et al
as 2:2018cv00290
Plaintiff:
LESLIE WILLIS
Defendant:
KATHLEEN A. DURKIN, LAWRENCE J. O' TOOLE, TIMOTHY FINNERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOOLE v. FPC MCKEAN WARDEN et al
as 1:2017cv00236
Petitioner:
ALGERNON TOOLE
Respondent:
FPC MCKEAN WARDEN and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
O'TOOLE et al v. D.J. HANNON & SONS, INC.
as 2:2017cv01120
Plaintiff:
MARTIN O'TOOLE and REGIS CLAUS
Defendant:
D.J. HANNON & SONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
O'TOOLE et al v. NEXUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
as 2:2017cv00812
Plaintiff:
MARTIN O'TOOLE and REGIS CLAUS
Defendant:
NEXUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
O'TOOLE et al v. R&B CONTRACTING & EXCAVATING, INC.
as 2:2017cv00633
Plaintiff:
MARTIN O'TOOLE and REGIS CLAUS
Defendant:
R&B CONTRACTING & EXCAVATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
