Cases 21 - 30 of 132
SNYDER v. KERTES et al
as 2:2021cv01620
Plaintiff:
GREGG L. SYNDER and GREGG L. SNYDER
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN SEAN KERTES, VICE-CHAIRMAN DOUGLAS W. CHEW, SECRETARY GINA CERILLI-SLASHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PANTELIC v. NATIONAL HOOD EXHAUST & FIRE GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01371
Defendant:
NATIONAL HOOD EXHAUST & FIRE GROUP, LLC, APEX HOOD EXHAUST & FIRE GROUP, LLC and BRYAN PAINTER
Plaintiff:
LJUBOMIR PANTELIC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HAWKEY v. CHEW et al
as 2:2021cv01339
Plaintiff:
HUGH JAMES HAWKEY, JR.
Defendant:
DOUGLAS CHEW, GINA CERILLI, SEAN KERTES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RUPERT et al v. RANGE RESOURCES - APPALACHIA, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01281
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. RUPERT, WILLIAM E. TRAVIS, KAREN A. TRAVIS and others
Defendant:
RANGE RESOURCES - APPALACHIA, LLC and RANGE RESOURCES CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANGLE v. MONTAG
as 1:2021cv00252
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ANGLE, II and BRYAN ANGLE, II
Defendant:
DR. MONTAG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH et al v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2021cv01007
Plaintiff:
ANN SMITH, BLAIR SMITH and THE ANN SMITH CHILDREN ILIT
Defendant:
BRYAN DAVIS, THE ADVISORS LLC, LPL FINANCIAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
HILL v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 2:2021cv00659
Defendant:
MS WARDEN BRYAN L. KLINE, LIEUTENANT BRAD TOMASELLO, COUNSELOR CORY SNYDER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MITCHELL v. JONES et al
as 1:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
DAMILE Q. MITCHELL
Defendant:
EARL JONES, JOHN DOE #1, CAMBPELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ORBITAL ENGINEERING, INC. v. GEHRLING
as 2:2021cv00491
Defendant:
BRYAN T. GEHRLING
Plaintiff:
ORBITAL ENGINEERING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
