Cases 21 - 30 of 38
BURNSIDE v. SWINDELL et al
as 3:2018cv00191
Defendant:
STEPHANIE HOOVER and DR. KIM SWINDELL
Plaintiff:
JOHN OTIS BURNSIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PETERSON v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GLUNT, MS. BARBER, MS. HOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. WEST MIFFLIN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2016cv01066
Plaintiff:
MARK HART
Defendant:
WEST MIFFLIN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, DR. DANIEL CASTAGNA, DR. MARK HOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOVER et al v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01013
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY D. HOOVER and NANCY HOOVER
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. , DEPUY INC. , SYNTHES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOOVER v. DORCON et al
as 2:2015cv00962
Plaintiff:
KERRI HOOVER
Defendant:
ROBERT DORCON , JAMES BRICE and THE BOROUGH OF DONORA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOVER v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
STACY R. HOOVER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and U.S. POST OFFICE AT PATTON, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
HOOVER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv00139
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARY HOOVER
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SAMUEL, SON & CO., INC. v. BEACH et al
as 1:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL, SON & CO., INC.
Defendant:
ERIK BEACH , ESMARK-EXCALIBUR LLC and ERIC A. HOOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
HOOVER v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2011cv00261
Petitioner:
HARRY HOOVER
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
