Cases 41 - 50 of 73
PEREZ v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
ROBIN L. PEREZ
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
PEREZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00812
Petitioner:
ESTELA PEREZ
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
YUMIL PEREZ
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM, REV. PHIL MAUST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. TECSOL, INC.
as 2:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
TECSOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. SUN PENANG INC et al
as 2:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
SUN PENANG INC and HSIAO YEN WU
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
PEREZ v. HORIZONTAL WELL DRILLERS, LLC
as 3:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
HORIZONTAL WELL DRILLERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. WETZEL
as 3:2014cv00272
Plaintiff:
YUMIL PEREZ
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, REV. PHIL MAUST, DEPUTY SECRETARY DANIEL BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. WPN CORPORATION ET AL
as 2:2014cv01494
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
WPN CORPORATION, RONALD LABOW, SEVERSTAL WHEELING, INC. RETIREMENT COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PEREZ v. WORLD HEALTH ALTERNATIVES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01168
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
WORLD HEALTH ALTERNATIVES, INC. and WORLD HEALTH ALTERNATIVES HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BRANDT, BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 2:2014cv00681
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE E. BRANDT, BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG , THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG , CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , THOMAS PEREZ , JACOB J. LEW and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
