Cases 41 - 50 of 101
PETERKIN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
DEPUTY ERIC AMEL, JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE #4 and others
Plaintiff:
AL-TARIQ PETERKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NIXON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00353
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN DOE #1, C.O. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CISZEK v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv01693
Plaintiff:
JUDITH K. CISZEK
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, DAWN PICKERTON, WESTMORELAND COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00267
Defendant:
JOHN DOE - 2, JOHN DOE - 3, J. BEACH and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YONKERS v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv00946
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER NEELY, JOHN DOE #1, WESTMORELAND COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
JORDAN YONKERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HENDRYCH v. SHELTAIR AVIATION SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00701
Plaintiff:
MARK HENDRYCH
Defendant:
SHELTAIR AVIATION SERVICES, LLC , SHELTAIR AVIATION LGA, LLC , JOHN DOE, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. BAUMCRATZ et al
as 1:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
RALPH J. CARTER
Defendant:
ADAM BAUMCRATZ, CODY WRIGHT, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHMOND v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
BRENDA RICHMOND
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH , SCOTT SCHUBERT , JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY et al v. O'MALLEY et al
as 2:2017cv01599
Plaintiff:
CALISIA KELLEY and JOHNNIE MAE KELLEY
Defendant:
BRIAN O'MALLEY, DOMINIC RIVOTTI, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER et al v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
DARREN MILLER and DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYBETH ANDERSON, MAX GOTTESMAN, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
