Cases 81 - 90 of 177
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MCANULTY v. SMITH
as 2:2019cv00815
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Petitioner:
RICHARD A. MCANULTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BURNSWORTH v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv00650
Defendant:
LISA HARKINS and WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Plaintiff:
JESSICA BURNSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WALTON et al
as 2:2019cv00645
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN LOWTHER, DEPUTY WARDEN SCHWARTZ, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. MANSOUR et al
as 2:2019cv00399
Defendant:
MARK MANSOUR, WESTMORELAND COUNTY, MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 10 and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD T. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MICHAELS v. MADDEN et al
as 2:2019cv00207
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY JAIL, US MARSHALL PENNSYLVANIA, WESTMORELAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS MICHAELS and JAMES THOMAS MICHAELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CISZEK v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv01693
Plaintiff:
JUDITH K. CISZEK
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, DAWN PICKERTON, WESTMORELAND COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGREAL et al v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY CHILDREN'S BUREAU et al
as 2:2018cv01601
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCGREAL, SR. and DENISE MCGREAL
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY CHILDREN'S BUREAU and SHARA SAVEIKIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
