Cases 1 - 10 of 106
BAILEY-BAKER v. PASQUARELLI et al
as 2:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Derrick Bailey-Baker
Defendant:
PASQUARELLI and sarver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KIRBY v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
JESSICA KIRBY
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER, DONALD YEALY, AMBER FLECK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
BAILEY v. NAPOLEON et al
as 2:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
TARIQ QAADIR BAILEY
Defendant:
NAPOLEON, HAINES, VANDIVNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. NELNET STUDENT LOAN SERVICER et al
as 2:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
SANDRA D. BAILEY
Defendant:
NELNET STUDENT LOAN SERVICER, CONDUENT STUDENT LOAN SERVICER, NELNET SERVICING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
OBEY v. COLLIE et al.
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DEVON OBEY
Defendant:
OFFICER COLLIE, UNIT MANAGER COLLEY, OFFICER DONOGHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Eddie Bailey
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
VAN HOOSER v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
GARY VAN HOOSER
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEIN v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
SHIVA STEIN
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
