Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00598
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00647
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00213
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00591
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01573
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MALARIK v. ARAMARK AT PNC PARK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00660
Plaintiff: JAMES M. MALARIK
Defendant: ARAMARK AT PNC PARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADELMAN et al v. JACOBS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00607
Plaintiff: DANIEL ADELMAN and JENNIFER ADELMAN
Defendant: ANDREW JACOBS , TODD MODENA , BRIAN MARKUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOP412, LLC v. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2017cv01229
Plaintiff: SHOP412, LLC
Defendant: ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
Counter_claimant: ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
Counter_defendant: SHOP412, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PITTMAN v. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP et al
as 3:2017cv00163
Plaintiff: GABRIEL PITTMAN
Defendant: PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?