Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SOROKAPUT v. BONNER et al
as 1:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
PETER SOROKAPUT
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JAMES BONNER, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY PRISON and JUDGE WILLIAM BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBB v. BONNER
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MARCEL WEBB
Defendant:
MICHAEL C. BONNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COUNTY OF BUTLER et al v. THOMAS W. WOLF et al
as 2:2020cv00677
Plaintiff:
R.W. MCDONALD & SONS, INC., NANCY GIFFORD, COUNTY OF FAYETTE and others
Defendant:
THOMAS W. WOLF and RACHEL LEVINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWSOME v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00317
Defendant:
CARTER, JOHN WETZEL, Lt. JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
BRAKEER NEWSOME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00815
Petitioner:
JERMANE E. BONNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BONNER v. USA
as 2:2010cv00354
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JERMANE E. BONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
FIEDLER v. OSBORNE et al
as 2:2009cv01138
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FIEDLER
Defendant:
OSBORNE, ROBERT STEESE, LAWRENCE T. SILVIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FIELDER v. FORNELLI et al
as 2:2009cv00881
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FIELDER
Defendant:
FRANCIS J. FORNELLI, JOHN C. REED, THOMAS R. DOBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FIEDLER v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2009cv00821
Petitioner:
BRIAN THOMAS FIEDLER, JR.
Respondent:
MICHAEL W. HARLOW, RYAN BONNER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
