Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CALLOWAY v. BOROUGH OF PITCAIRN et al
as 2:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
ALLYSON CALLOWAY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF PITCAIRN, MARGARET STEVICK, SCOTT FARALLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CALLOWAY v. ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
WILLIE CALLOWAY
Defendant:
ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION, MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES, LLC and GETINGE AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01814
Plaintiff:
DENISE TATUM, BOBBY E. ABRAMS, JR., STEFON L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
CALLOWAY v. BOURGHINI et al
as 2:2012cv01276
Plaintiff:
TORIAN CALLOWAY
Defendant:
DANTE BOURGHINI, DENNIS CHAKEY, MICHAEL LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CALLOWAY v. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2011cv00034
Petitioner:
DAVID CALLOWAY
Respondent:
BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS,etc. v. BALDWIN, et.al.
as 2:2010cv00800
Plaintiff:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS
Defendant:
ARTHUR BALDWIN , LINDA COBB , JEROME BULLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
CALLOWAY et al v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00664
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY CALLOWAY and SHAWN CALLOWAY
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CALLOWAY v. DIPAOLA
as 3:2008cv00257
Plaintiff:
EDMOUND CALLOWAY
Defendant:
DENNY DIPAOLA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
