Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MOYER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. MOYER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
MOYER v. GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD PRESERVING, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00164
Defendant:
GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD PRESERVING, INCORPORATED and GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD - PA, INC.
Plaintiff:
GARY MOYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HILL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00008
Plaintiff:
LAVOND A. HILL
Defendant:
BOBBI J. SALAMON, HUNT, PROBURSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
VINOSKY v. CONSIGLIO et al
as 3:2020cv00134
Plaintiff:
SCOTT M. VINOSKY
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, LEO BERG, MAUREEN LETCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WALKER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00627
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. WALKER, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, KEVIN KAUFFMAN, DIANE KAGARISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARNEGIE STRATEGIC DESIGN ENGINEERS, LLC v. CLOHERTY et al
as 2:2013cv01112
Plaintiff:
CARNEGIE STRATEGIC DESIGN ENGINEERS, LLC
Defendant:
SCOTT M. CLOHERTY , JAMES W. BURGER, III , ROY D. PIONTEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
SPENCE v. FRICK et al
as 2:2012cv00385
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. SPENCE, JR.
Defendant:
SALLY FRICK, GEORGE BILLS, JAMES WYMARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. MOYER et al
as 3:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
RICHARD B. MOYER and DANIEL C. PERSHING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
