Cases 11 - 20 of 738
Parks v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Carlton B Parks
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeffrey S. Sutton, Travis R. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Guess v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Rachel Dianna Guess
Respondent:
Robert H. Fleming, Jr., Samuel Fleming, Douglas R Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cox v. Farmer et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Cox
Defendant:
Joseph Farmer, Frank Strada, Beathany Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tubbs-Chandler v. Gallion et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Tubbs-Chandler
Defendant:
Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Tristan J Hall
Defendant:
Charme P Allen, William C Bright and Hector I Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weaver v. Eller
as 3:2023cv00394
Petitioner:
Harry C Weaver, Jr
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Lawson et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Martin E. Hughes
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Roger D Wilson Detention Facility et al
as 3:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Meccia Stanley
Defendant:
Roger D Wilson Detention Facility and C/O Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
