Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Pitts v. USA
as 2:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Kendell Pitts
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Scott v. Blackwelder et al
as 1:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott, Carman Brown and Frankie Brown
Defendant:
Sheriff Murry Blackwelder, Owen Blackwelder, Tammy McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Landers v. Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC et al (JRG1)
as 1:2020cv00183
Defendant:
Loancare, LLC, Joseph B. Pitt, Jr., Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald T. Landers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Whitt v. Thornton et al
as 4:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Dr Jones, William Harold, Mike Pitts and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Kenneth Whitt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2019mc00012
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, C.C.A.'s Well Path Medical, Core Civic of America and others
Plaintiff:
Arras Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts et al v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al (TV2)
as 4:2019cv00016
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Pitts and Terry Pitts
Defendant:
AM Cleaning Inc., Kroger Limited Partnership I, The Kroger Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Palmer v. Lincoln County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 4:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Christopher Palmer, Jr.
Defendant:
Lincoln County Sheriff's Dept, Shannon Bostic, Doug Boernger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00310
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Newell v. Watson et al
as 1:2014cv00304
Plaintiff:
Jimmy J Newell
Defendant:
Eric Watson, Tyler Pitts and Glenn Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. USA
as 1:2014cv00139
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dexter Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
