Cases 101 - 110 of 2,594
Doe #1 (DTB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (DTB), John Doe #2 (MAB), John Doe #3 (DJB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #013 v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
John Doe #013
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe #15 v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
John Doe #15
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01332
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe 1332
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe 71
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers AFL-CIO (IBEW) Local 429 et al
as 3:2023cv01262
Plaintiff:
Jeremie Montgomery
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers AFL-CIO (IBEW) Local 429 and Conti Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Doe v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe 73
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #012 v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
John Doe #012
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe #016 v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01319
Plaintiff:
John Doe #016
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Employees of Social Security Insurance Administration
as 3:2023cv01307
Plaintiff:
Travis Kenard Dawson
Defendant:
Employees of Social Security Insurance Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
