Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Bowen v. RCADC et al
as 3:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Walter T. Bowen, Jr.
Defendant:
RCADC and Rudd Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tennessee Equality Project Foundation, Inc. v. The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Equality Project Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
The City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, The City Council of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Shane McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowen v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 3:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Andrea Y. Bowen
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Walmart Inc., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Hicks et al v. Cantrell et al
as 3:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Grant Hicks, Tristan Nixon and Lucas Mario Nutt
Defendant:
Wesley Cantrell, Jonathan Fenoy, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mullins v. City of Murfreesboro, et al.
as 3:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Bill Doe, Chief Michael Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bowen v. Magotteaux, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant:
Magotteaux, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry Bowen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Bowen v. Kadish
as 3:2016cv00831
Plaintiff:
Gary Bowen
Defendant:
Kevin Kadish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
