Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Santiago v. Davidson County Sheriff's et al
as 3:2023cv00400
Petitioner:
Edwin Santiago, Jr.
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's and DDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Valdes v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00009
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Santiago Froilan Valdes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Salas v. Jai Mata, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00818
Plaintiff:
Henry Santiago Salas
Defendant:
Jai Mata, Inc. and Ashok Kumar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Munson v. Bryan et al
as 3:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Munson
Defendant:
Robert C. Bryan, Michael Barbee, Santiago McKlean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv01975
Plaintiff:
Magaly Santiago
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Veloz v. Marshall County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Giraldo Bersores Veloz
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Office, Norman Dalton, Sabrina Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driver v. Fabish et al
as 3:2013cv01087
Plaintiff:
De'Mario Driver
Defendant:
Frank Fabish, Michael Ferrish, Jorge Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago et al v. Standard Candy Company, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
Alexander Santiago and Eric Giddens
Defendant:
Standard Candy Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Castro v. Northern Asset Management, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Joy Castro
Defendant:
Northern Asset Management, LLC and Frank Santiago
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Contreras et al v. Little et al
as 3:2007cv00254
Plaintiff:
Rolando Contreras, Sergio Batista, Gilberto Mendoza and others
Defendant:
George Little, Roland Colson, Tommy Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
