Cases 31 - 40 of 155
Pittman v. Hines et al
as 6:2019cv00546
Defendant:
Dillon Logistics, Inc., Dillon Transport, Inc., Consumer County Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy, Sr. v. Wright et al
as 6:2019cv00510
Defendant:
Lt. Michael L Odom, MHC Lyndsey Howell, Sgt. FNU McAndrews and others
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00720
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kutt v. Apple Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00316
Defendant:
Google Corporation, Storage Post Inc, Seasons Condominiums and others
Plaintiff:
Mers Kutt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Thibodeaux v. Kemp et al
as 6:2019cv00381
Defendant:
State Counselor Barbara L Law, Mark Calhoon, Office of Inspector General United States Marshal Service and others
Petitioner:
Paul Dewayne Thibodeaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovings v. Monroe, et al
as 6:2019cv00367
Defendant:
Assist Warden Debra Cockeral, Assist Warden FNU Metor and Warden Carol Monroe
Plaintiff:
Iran Bernard Lovings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAREN F. NEWTON REVOCABLE TRUST et al v. CANADIAN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LP
as 4:2019cv00429
Plaintiff:
SANDRA GRAHAM, DEBBIE CHESNEY, JANET ANDERS and others
Defendant:
CANADIAN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00242
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mejia v. Monroe et al
as 6:2019cv00180
Defendant:
Charles D Meador, II, Officer Unknown, Carol E Monroe, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Mejia, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
