Cases 31 - 40 of 94
Confessore v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2019cv00627
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Confessore
Defendant:
Kylie Tisdale, Larry Shults, Thomas Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Alvarado v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00593
Defendant:
FCC Beaumont Medium, Department of Justice, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOTTON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00158
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, SHARON MILLER, Issam Harmoush and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOTTON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Abdulwahab v. US Department of Justice et al
as 1:2018cv00304
Defendant:
Executive Office of US Attorney, Office of Information Policy and US Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Adley H Abdulwahab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America (Department of Justice) et al v. Fagans
as 6:2018cv00281
Movant:
United States of America (Department of Justice)
Defendant:
Michael Duntae Fagans
Plaintiff:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Keller v. USA et al
as 1:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Keller
Defendant:
usa, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. USA et al
as 1:2018cv00161
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Keller
Defendant:
usa, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. U S Department of Justice-Kimmela Boyd
as 1:2018cv00092
Petitioner:
Johnathan Lamont Grimes
Respondent:
U S Department of Justice-Kimmela Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ware v. Lewis et al
as 1:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ulysses T Ware
Defendant:
M K Lewis, Kim Jones, Wanda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
