Cases 1 - 10 of 798
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
John A. Mansour v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 4:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
John A. Mansour
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Alvarez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Edwing Ahmed Alvarez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields et al v. Port Arthur Independent School District et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Robin Dennis Perry Shields and Corrections Officer JOHN DOE ONE
Defendant:
Port Arthur Independent School District, Mark Porterie and Monique Bienvenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU Mr. King, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
