Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Rios v. Walters et al
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Darren Walters, Katrina White, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv02510
Plaintiff:
Amanda M Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Latonia Smith
Defendant:
M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lundahl v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv01017
Petitioner:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent:
M. Smith, Merrick Garland, Collete Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dukes v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
Rico Cortez Dukes
Defendant:
Tavara Lee and Gladys M Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith et al v. JPMC Specialty Mortgage LLC
as 4:2019cv00751
Plaintiff:
Nikole M. Smith and Shawn D. Smith
Defendant:
JPMC Specialty Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US Bank NA v. Smith et al
as 3:2017cv00737
Plaintiff:
US Bank NA
Defendant:
Francis M Smith and May R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01458
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Smith
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2016cv00279
Plaintiff:
Shawn D. Smith and Nikole M. Smith
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ditech Financial LLC
as 4:2016cv00076
Plaintiff:
Robert F Smith and Patricia M Smith
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
