Cases 71 - 80 of 1,132
Pham v. Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority et al
as 2:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Kurt Pham
Defendant:
Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, Donna Mills, Pamela Jones-Watford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Wilson et al v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Robyn Wilson, Tamera Streeter, Dana Oliver and others
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Capel v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M. Capel
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, City of Chesapeake, Virginia Employment Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Andrews, Esq. v. Jones, LPN
as 3:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Andrews, Esq.
Defendant:
Dorothy Jones, LPN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Jr. v. Hite et al
as 1:2022cv01284
Defendant:
Ronald Hite, Ronnie and Jimmy L Pride, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Unknown
as 3:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Tevon C. Jones
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Derrick Antonio Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jones v. Gregory
as 1:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
Heath L Jones
Defendant:
Alisa A Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
