Cases 1 - 10 of 12
D.A. Realestate Investment, LLC et al v. City of Norfolk
as 2:2021cv00653
Plaintiff:
D.A. Realestate Investment, LLC, Tax Parcel No.: 49314300, Real property known as Tax Parcel No.: 49314300 and others
Defendant:
City of Norfolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.A. by his next friend Jessica Jones v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00588
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
D.A. by his next friend Jessica Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Canady v. Dixon, et al.
as 3:2019cv00725
Defendant:
D.A. Lewis, Mark Amonette and Leon Dixon
Plaintiff:
Marlon Canady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Portsmouth v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00331
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Portsmouth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jacobs v. Trammel
as 3:2018cv00249
Plaintiff:
Karen Jacobs
Defendant:
D.A. Trammel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Bearers et al
as 2:2017cv00336
Plaintiff:
Franklin C. Smith
Defendant:
Cpl. D.N. Bearers, Cpl. Uzzle, D.A. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad et al v. Ellis et al
as 3:2016cv01005
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad and Sheamus D.A. Nelson-Prasad II
Defendant:
Ellis, Carolyn D. Nelson, Viviene B. Creek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldstein v. Trammell
as 3:2016cv01003
Plaintiff:
David Goldstein
Defendant:
D.A Trammell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton vs. Clarke, et al.
as 1:2016cv00635
Plaintiff:
Antoine Jermaine Thornton
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Karen Stapleton, Edward L. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
