Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Horton v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
William R Horton, Jr
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Horton et al v. Dollar Tree
as 2:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
John Horton, African Child Abuse Victim A Lawton, Oklahoma and African Child Abuse Victim B Lawton, Oklahoma
Defendant:
Dollar Tree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Scott v. Martine Arents IM Investments LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Gail Scott
Defendant:
Martine Arents IM Investments LLC, DHI MortgageCompany Carolyn Bertelson, Ocwen Loan Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Scott v. Arents et al
as 1:2021cv00995
Plaintiff:
Gail Scott
Defendant:
Martine Arents, IM Investments LLC, DHI Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whorley et al v. Northam et al
as 3:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brummett, Felipe Franco, Dwight Horton and others
Defendant:
Tori Raiford, Brian J. Moran, Eric Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Clarke
as 1:2019cv00004
Defendant:
Harold Clarke
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horton v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv01331
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Horton
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Battle v. Mcadams et al
as 2:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Battle
Defendant:
Lowell Mcadams, Henry Adamson, Tishaun Ophelia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00576
Plaintiff:
Samuel K. Robinson
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Nahtan L. Horton and Willie L. Robinson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Horton v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01174
Plaintiff:
Tracy Horton
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
