Cases 101 - 110 of 517
Stanley v. Mason County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv05860
Plaintiff:
Sloan Patrick Stanley
Defendant:
Mason County Jail and Kevin Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 2:2021cv01568
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Defendant:
Department of Social and Health Services, Melinda Young and Melissa J Osman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenwood v. Pierce County Municipality et al
as 3:2021cv05896
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Michael Greenwood
Defendant:
Pierce County Municipality, Miguel Balderrama, J Slothower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gantt v. Balderrama
as 3:2021cv05855
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gantt and Matthew T Gantt
Defendant:
Miguel Balderrama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. Holbrook
as 2:2021cv01468
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Donald R Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White Eagle v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv05716
Plaintiff:
Naomi Sue White Eagle and Lowell G Lowe
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Stephen Sinclair, Cheryl Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. US Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2021cv01281
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington State Department of Natural Resources and Pollution Control Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daisy v. Haynes et al
as 3:2021cv05709
Plaintiff:
Jordan Daisy
Defendant:
Ronald Haynes, Sara Kariko, Ryan Herrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edin v. Haynes et al
as 3:2021cv05718
Plaintiff:
Farhan Edin
Defendant:
Ronald Haynes, Sara Kariko, Ryan Herrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Van Ogle et al
as 3:2021cv05818
Plaintiff:
Christopher Arthur Miller
Defendant:
Dan Van Ogle, Jeneva Cotton, Scott Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
