Cases 71 - 80 of 160
Meyer v. Uttecht
as 3:2018cv05864
Respondent:
Jeffry Uttecht and Jeffrey A Uttecht
Petitioner:
Shannon Edward Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Warner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv05818
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Shannon Warner
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Block v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2018cv01048
Plaintiff:
Anne Block and Anne K Block
Defendant:
Snohomish County, Patrick McMahon, Amanda Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Block v. King County Superior Court et al
as 3:2018cv05579
Plaintiff:
Anne Block and Anne K Block
Defendant:
Anne Marie Soto, Laura Inveen, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2018cv01056
Plaintiff:
Anne Block and Anne K Block
Defendant:
Judge Michael R Scott, Anne Marie Soto, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Warren v. Department of Corrections for the State of Washington et al
as 3:2018cv05550
Plaintiff:
Melford John Warren, Jr
Defendant:
Shannon Felicia Ann Smith, Amanjot Kaur Jaswal, Edith Marie Sorrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. FPI Management Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00998
Defendant:
Ms Candace Perrin, Brannden Francisco, Rita Ardeiente and others
Plaintiff:
Henry James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Block v. Washington State Bar Association et al
as 2:2018cv00907
Plaintiff:
Anne K Block
Defendant:
Washington State Bar Association , Kevin Bank, Linda Eide and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Still v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv00887
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jean Still
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera et al v. City of Lacey et al
as 3:2018cv05476
Plaintiff:
Rafael Rivera
Defendant:
City of Lacey, Lacey Police Department, Andy Rider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
