Cases 1 - 10 of 51
King v. Chronister et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Cathy King
Defendant:
N. Chronister, Berkeley County Sheriff's Department, Berkeley County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King, Jr. v. Office of the Commissioner for Marion County et al
as 5:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Roger Howard King, Jr.
Defendant:
Office of the Commissioner for Marion County, West Virginia Marion County Probation Office, Day Report and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Roane
as 5:2022cv00301
Petitioner:
Gerald Tyrone King
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Campbell et al v. Kuhnle Brothers, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
David Campbell and Rebecca Campbell
Cross Claimant:
Kuhnle Brothers, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Tarquin Acid, LLC
Defendant:
Drake King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Property Damage
King v. Utt et al
as 5:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
Andrew King
Defendant:
Jason K. Utt, Friend Estep and City of New Martinsville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marietta Area Healthcare, Inc. et al v. King et al
as 5:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Michael D. Roberts, M.D. and Michael A. King
Plaintiff:
Marietta Memorial Hospital, Marietta Area Healthcare, Inc. and Marietta Healthcare Physicians, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
West v. King
as 5:2020cv00025
Respondent:
Timothy King
Petitioner:
Richard D. West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. USA
as 3:2018cv00020
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas James King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
King v. Saad
as 2:2017cv00065
Petitioner:
Mark Lewis King
Respondent:
J. Saad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2017cv00019
Petitioner:
Mark Lewis King
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
