Cases 21 - 30 of 126,796
Adkins v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Glen Wesley Adkins
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Neal v. Varien et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Defendant:
Magistrate Steve Tarbett, Magistrate Melanie Sang, Officer C. A. Varien and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Neal, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal v. Western Regional Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Defendant:
Steve Tarbett, Administrator Carl Aldridge, Kyle Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Neal, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Warden et al
as 5:2024cv00495
Defendant:
Warden, Nurse Angela Hannah, PA-C Joe Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Sibrian Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Travis v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00492
Defendant:
Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson and Lieutenant Timothy Tibbs
Plaintiff:
Denzel Travis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00491
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Jermaine D. Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wright v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00490
Defendant:
Doug Minor, Jane Does, Valeria Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Huber et al
as 2:2024cv00485
Defendant:
Officer J. A. Jones and Brian Huber
Plaintiff:
Michael Jay Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00489
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bates v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
Keandre Bates
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
