Cases 31 - 40 of 252
Craig et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06662
Plaintiff:
Maggie Craig and Donald W. Craig
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mattingly et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05914
Plaintiff:
Donna S. Mattingly and John Craig Mattingly
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reagan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03571
Plaintiff:
Jody Reagan and Craig Reagan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craig et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02769
Plaintiff:
Sherri Craig and Robert Craig, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pugh v. Johnson
as 1:2016cv01681
Respondent:
B.J. Johnson
Petitioner:
Michael Craig Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Craig v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01421
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Kay Craig
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Legg v. Adkins et al
as 2:2016cv01371
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Legg
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority , South Central Regional Jail, West Virginia Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woolstenhulme et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16135
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ann Woolstenhulme and Stephen Craig Rhodes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16042
Plaintiff:
Jodie Thompson and Craig Thompson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. Mildred Mitchell Bateman Hospital et al
as 3:2015cv15914
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Todd Cook
Defendant:
Mildred Mitchell Bateman Hospital, Craig Richardson, Pat Fran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
