Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Harper v. Biser et al
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Holly R. Harper
Defendant:
Paul Biser, Christopher Dean Chiles, Charles Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Miller et al v. Brack et al
as 3:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Miller, Patrick Amos Robichaud and Patricia Ann Robichaud
Defendant:
Cristiana A. Brack, Paul Dorin Trif and Inka Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Amos et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Sarah Amos, Lesley Burriss and Patrick D. Burriss
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, The Dow Chemical Company and The Dow Chemical Company Company-Paid Life Insurance Plan, Employee-Paid Life Insurance Plan, Group Number 01170
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hicks v. Canterbury et al
as 1:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Amos Gabriel Hicks
Defendant:
Steven D. Canterbury, Booker T. Stephens, Francine Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Davis-Stuart, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Anethra Coleman, Anthony Dalmer, Scott Brewer and others
Defendant:
Davis-Stuart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Hicks v. Ames
as 1:2020cv00665
Petitioner:
Amos Gabriel Hicks
Respondent:
Superintendent Donald Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. Ames
as 2:2020cv00665
Petitioner:
Amos Gabriel Hicks
Respondent:
Superintendent Donald Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amos et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02116
Plaintiff:
Angela Amos and Michael Amos
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amos v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv00829
Plaintiff:
Kim L. Amos
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
