Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wasanyi v. Aramark Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
David M. Wasanyi
Defendant:
Aramark Services Incorporated and Brittany Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Aramark Food Service Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00774
Plaintiff:
William Sharp
Defendant:
Kathy Hubb and Aramark Food Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC.
as 3:2017cv04062
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
Warren v. Spencer
as 5:2015cv11920
Plaintiff:
Robert Warren and Sarah Warren
Defendant:
Billy T. Spencer , Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mills v. McGarry et al
as 2:2012cv02873
Plaintiff:
Marvin Mills
Defendant:
Glen McGarry , Aramark Food Service , Lori Spiva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Dillion, et al
as 2:2012cv04751
Plaintiff:
Cedeal Harper
Defendant:
Kathy Dillion, Sherrie Cox, Jason Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Mount Olive Correctional Center et al
as 2:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Gregg Dulaney Smith
Defendant:
Mount Olive Correctional Center, James Rubenstein, Samuel Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alderman v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
as 5:2011cv00286
Plaintiff:
Robert Alderman
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Persinger v. Roberts et al
as 2:2009cv00825
Plaintiff:
Roger Persinger
Defendant:
Naomi Roberts, Doctor Subosh, Doctor Gajendragakar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
