Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Ahmed v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10026
Plaintiff:
Naeem Ahmed
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , John Doe, John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Catharon Intellectual Property, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00705
Plaintiff:
Catharon Intellectual Property, LLC
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.
as 3:2013cv04202
Plaintiff:
Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC
Defendant:
Facebook Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TimesLines, Inc v. Facebook, Inc.
as 1:2011cv06867
Plaintiff:
TimesLines, Inc
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al
as 1:2010cv00569
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Ceglia
Defendant:
Mark Elliot Zuckerberg and Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al
as 5:2007cv01389
Defendant:
David Gucwa, Pacific Northwest Software, Inc., Winston Williams and others
Plaintiff:
The Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg
Undetermined:
Fenwick & West LLP and R. Gregory Roussel
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Divya Narendra, Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss
Special Master:
Special Master George C. Fisher
Other:
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
Interested Party:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP
Trustee:
Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
Intervenor:
CNET Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Spatz et al v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02662
Plaintiff:
Michael Spatz and Sanjay Israni
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Chang et al v. Facebook Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02680
Plaintiff:
James Chang and Sameer Ansari
Defendant:
Facebook Inc. , Mark Zuckerberg , David A. Ebersman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Bohannon v. Facebook, Inc.
as 4:2012cv01894
Plaintiff:
Glynnis Bohannon
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
