Cases 71 - 80 of 97
MDL 1735 - In RE: Wal-Mart Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litigation
as 2:2006cv00225
Plaintiff:
Nancy Hall, Nancy Hall, Nancy Hall and others
Defendant:
Sam's West, Inc., Sam's West, Inc., Sam's West, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
In Re: Canon U.S.A., Inc., Digital Cameras Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2006md01740
Plaintiff:
David Hyman, David Hyman, David Hyman and others
Defendant:
Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: American Family Mutual Insurance Co. Overtime Pay Litigation
as 1:2006cv17430
Plaintiff:
Robert Schultz, Robert Schultz, Robert Schultz and others
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, American Family Mutual Insurance Company, American Family Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
In Re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2006md01738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Plaintiff(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453 and others
Defendant:
Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453, Defendant(s) in Civil Action Animal Science vs Hebei, 05-CV-453 and others
Amicu:
Ministry of Commerce for the Peoples Republic of China and Ministry of Commerce for the Peoples Republic of China
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Asbestos Products Liabaility Litigation (No. VI) MDL 875
as 1:2006mc00003
Plaintiff:
George H. Martindale, George H. Martindale and George H. Martindale
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
In Re: Celexa and Lexapro Products Liability Litigation
as 4:2006md01736
Plaintiff:
Annabel Dobbs, Annabel Dobbs, Annabel Dobbs and others
Defendant:
Forest Laboratories, Forest Laboratories, Forest Laboratories and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Delphi Corporation Securities, Derivative and "Erisa" Litigation
as 2:2005md01725
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hanners, Carolyn Hanners, Vanessa Jones and others
Defendant:
Deloitte and Touche, L. L. P., Deloitte and Touche, L. L. P., Deloitte and Touche, L. L. P. and others
Objector:
Pamela Geller
Special Master:
Lyan Phillips
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Cessna 208 Series Aircraft Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2005md01721
Miscellaneou:
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Plaintiff:
Julie Beth Ingram, Julie Beth Ingram, Julie Beth Ingram and others
Defendant:
Cessna Aircraft Company, Cessna Aircraft Company, Cessna Aircraft Company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Amy Silvey, Amy Silvey, Stephanie Ann Allan and others
Movant:
Richard U Simon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multi-District Litigation
In re: Medtronic, Inc., Implantable Defilbrillators Products Liability Litigation
as 0:2005md01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel and others
Defendant:
Defendants' Liaison Counsel, Defendants' Liaison Counsel, Defendants' Lead Counsel and others
Intervenor:
Bloomberg L.P., Bloomberg L.P. and Star Tribune
Mediator:
Nicole Shipman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
In re: Guidant Corp Implantable Defibrillators Products Liability Litigation
as 0:2005md01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel and others
Defendant:
Defendants' Lead Counsel, Defendants' Liaison Counsel, St. Anthony's Medical Center and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Defendants' Lead Counsel and Defendants' Liaison Counsel
Intervenor:
Bloomberg L.P. and Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Martha Janik
Special Master:
Arthur J Boylan and Patrick Juneau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
