Cases 101 - 110 of 710
Hale Fireworks, LLC et al v. Rasmussen
as 6:2021mc09004
Plaintiff:
Hale Fireworks, LLC and Robert Mitchell Hale
Defendant:
David Rasmussen
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00027
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00028
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00029
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00030
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Strong Man Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2021mc00031
Plaintiff:
Local 88 International Association of Sheet Metal Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada and others
Defendant:
Strong Man Services Incorporated doing business as SMS Mechanical, John Frederick Capurro and Jason Russell Hales
Benjamin Hamilton v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 21-16107
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN HALE HAMILTON
Marshall v. English, et al
as 21-3101
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE (4), Blind IRS Employee/Undercover Person, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMIE TURNER, Client/Associate/Stakeholder-Wizard Services/Joe Marshall's Companies, in his individual capacity, Estate of Travis Johnson, JOHN CORNELIUS, IRS Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division, Austin, Texas, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2021cv00435
Plaintiff:
Patrice McCaulley, Debra Bales, Philip Spence and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
