Cases 11 - 20 of 234
United States of America v. Carlisle (Wiltshire)
as 23-6776
Defendant:
DIONDRE CARLISLE, RAKEEM FLOWERS, TYRONE SMITH and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN WILTSHIRE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carlisle v. Univar Solutions Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04131
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Univar Solutions Inc., Christopher D. Pappas, David Jukes and others
Fannie Mae et al v. Amelia Aid Propco LLC
as 2:2023mc00012
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Amelia Aid Propco LLC, Ashley Aid Propco LLC, Bentley Aid Propco LLC and others
Receiver:
Michael F Flanagan
Fannie Mae v. Amelia AID Propco LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Fannie Mae
Defendant:
Amelia AID Propco LLC, Ashley AID Propco LLC, Bentley AID Propco and others
Receiver:
Michael F. Flanagan
Carlisle v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01956
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Banfield Realty LLC v. Copeland et al
as 1:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Banfield Realty LLC
Defendant:
William E Copeland, Jack Copeland, Kevin Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land (CERCLA)
Carlisle v. Velodyne Lidar, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10720
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc., Virginia Boulet, Michael Dee and others
United States v. Carlisle Denoyer
as 22-3402
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Carlisle Denoyer
Carlisle v. Shift Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09732
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Shift Technologies, Inc., George Arison, Toby Russell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
